Monday, December 16, 2024

The German No-Confidence Vote: Don’t Forget the E.U.

Two months after the collapse of Germany’s ruling coalition in the Bundestag, which problematically left a minority government in place, Chancellor Olaf Scholtz lost a vote of confidence on December 16, 2024 394 to 207, with 116 state representatives in the Bundestag abstaining. The result triggered an early election for February 23, 2024. I contend that two months is reasonable for a campaign season and that the claim of catastrophe since the coalition fell apart is overblown due to the continuing functioning of the E.U. even as one of its states would have a minority government until the triggered election.

With just over two months being deemed sufficient time in which to campaign, the hyperextended U.S. federal election season of more than a year and the specific claim that Kamala Harris didn’t have enough time to run for U.S. president from the third week of July to the end of October in 2024. To be sure, it takes longer to fit enough campaign rallies in during about three-and-a-half months in a union of states that in a state of a union, though the political need to campaign only in several “battleground” states mitigates the difference. Even so, that Germany is a large state in the E.U. and has territory equivalent to Montana and population equivalent to the 15 Midwestern states in the U.S. may mean that something like six months, well short of a year, is enough of a campaign season for U.S. presidential candidates.

Another way in which Germany being a state in the E.U. impacts the significance of the fall of the SDP-led coalition government is that the E.U. federal level was still functioning; all was not lost in terms of functioning government even on the state’s territory, for in a federal system, two governments have authority to govern in a given territory. Roughly a month before the vote, Axel Klausmeier, director of the Berlin Wall Foundation, had spoken at Harvard. He said that the collapse of the coalition in Germany had come at a particularly bad time, as Russia’s President Putin was pushing his military to make further inroads in the invasion of Ukraine. To have a paralyzed Bundestag with an invasion occurring nearby was something that Klausmeier believed Germany could not afford. However, he completely ignored the fact that the E.U. was supplying the Ukrainian government with more military aid, including equipment, than the U.S. was doing at the time. Therefore, the collapse of the government of the E.U. state of Germany did not evince a catastrophe concerning pushing Putin back militarily; the E.U. was still fully functional and Van der Leyen’s administration was lazar-set on pushing Putin’s army off Ukrainian territory. The “two systems of government” feature of federalism means that citizens are not completely dependent on either of those two systems—state or federal—so the E.U. could pick up the slack should the conservative party refuse to join with the SPD to pass legislation during the period before the state election in February, 2025.

Therefore, we can contest as exaggerated the following claim by the BBC: “Given Germany’s stalled economy and the global crises facing the West, staggering on until the [originally] scheduled election date of September 2025 [instead of the two-month trigger due to the no-confidence vote in December of 2024] risked being seen as irresponsible by the [state’s] electorate.”[1] I submit that the downside of both the coalition’s collapse and the two-month campaign season following the no-confidence vote is mitigated by the fact that the E.U. was still functioning unimpaired. For even with the two official direct-access institutions for state governments at the federal level—in the European Council and the Council of the E.U.—that the vast majority of state governments were fully functional means that even those two federal institutions could continue to function.

Indeed, recognition that Germany was at the time a semi-sovereign state in a semi-sovereign union would have the virtue of calming nervous Germans who thought catastrophe was just around the corner, as if the E.U. would allow Putin to invade Germany during its two months between majority governments and that the E.U. without a strong German state government would be paralyzed or even fall apart.



1. Damien McGuinness, “German Chancellor Olaf Scholz Loses Confidence Vote,” BBC.com, December 16, 2024.